For over three decades, Mexico has been a veritable paradise for global mining conglomerates, serving up some of the laxest regulations in Latin America. That is now changing.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Mexico\u2019s outgoing President, Andr\u00e9s Manuel Lop\u00e9z Obrador (aka AMLO), may only have a little over a month left in office, but he is by no means a lame duck. Quite the contrary: During the 30 days of September he will have more legislative power backing him up that at any other time during his six-year term. And he plans to make full use of it.<\/p>\n
This is the result of meticulous timing and cunning on AMLO\u2019s part. After subtle tweaks to the political calendar, the new legislature begins on September 1. However, AMLO\u2019s presidential successor, Claudia Shienbaum, does not start her term until October 1, giving AMLO a whole month with the new legislature. And in Mexico\u2019s June elections AMLO\u2019s party, MORENA, had won by a landslide, grabbing a \u201csuper majority\u201d \u2014 i.e. more than two-thirds of the seats \u2014 in the lower house and falling just two seats shy of winning another in the senate.<\/p>\n
A super majority allows for constitutional changes that have so far eluded the AMLO administration. They include a proposed root-and-branch restructuring of Mexico\u2019s judicial system, which is causing all manner of unease and consternation on both sides of the Rio Grande, as well as sweeping constitutional reforms to Mexico\u2019s mining laws. These proposals all form part of a package of reforms presented in February that could be approved as early as next month.<\/p>\n
Last week, the Constitutional Affairs Committee of the Chamber of Deputies approved by 30 votes to seven two constitutional reforms aimed at banning open-pit mining and fracking, as well as significantly restricting the use of genetically modified corn \u2014 an issue that is already the subject of an investor state dispute between Mexico and its North American trade partners, the United States and Canada.<\/p>\n
The lower house\u2019s Constitutional Affairs Committee also agreed to amend the Constitution to prevent the exploitation of water in areas with low availability, except for in high-population areas. As we reported a couple of years ago, large swathes of Mexico, including Mexico City, are grappling with acute water shortages. Last year, the civil association Water Advisory Council estimated that 21 million people do not have daily access to drinking water.<\/p>\n
Although the AMLO government has issued no new open pit concessions and has passed a bill to prevent this type of mining activity, the current permits have not been cancelled. That could change if the proposed reforms are passed. AMLO\u2019s administration opposes open pit mining for what the government sees as the method\u2019s outsized environmental impact. It also argues that the sector offers meagre contributions to state coffers, with foreign companies pocketing the lion\u2019s share of revenues and profits. AMLO himself said last year:<\/p>\n
[M]ining activity is not contributing to overall economic development and the redistribution of wealth in the country, so the privileges it enjoys over other land or water uses is not justified. Its contribution to overall welfare pales in comparison with the damage caused by the extraction of minerals, such as environmental degradation, irrational use of water, the pollution of rivers, channels and deforestation, among other phenomena.<\/p>\n
A Mining Paradise No More<\/p>\n
One thing that has set Mexico apart from most, if not all, other resource-rich countries in Latin America over the past 30 years is the extreme preferential treatment it grants to the mining industry. In the 1992 Mining Law \u2014 the brainchild of Carlos Salinas de Gortari, whose presidency of Mexico (1988-1994) set the country\u2019s economy upon a path of rampant privatisation, deregulation and trade liberalisation \u2014 mining activity took precedence over all other industries and activities. Article 6 of the law reads:<\/p>\n
The exploration, exploitation and beneficiation of the minerals or substances referred to in this Law are public utilities and will have preference over any other use or utilization of the land, subject to the conditions established herein, and only by a Federal Law may taxes be assessed on these activities.<\/p>\n
Thanks largely to this four-line paragraph, the claims of the mining industry on Mexican land have held greater weight than not just all other industries but all other human activity. For the following 31 years Mexico\u2019s federal government was bound by law to act against the interests and rights of both private landlords and local communities in order to guarantee mining companies access to the lands upon which a concession was granted.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo other mining law on the continent grants preferential access over any type of land use,\u201d Jorge Pel\u00e1ez Padilla, a professor of law at the Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), told the investigative news website Contralinea in 2013. The result has been rampant expropriations of private \u2014 and in some cases communal or even protected park \u2014 land, for the sake of private mining operations.<\/p>\n
The duration of the concessions granted can also be uncommonly long. The 1992 Mining Law allowed concessionaires to explore or exploit Mexican land for 50 years, and up to one century if the interested party requests an extension, without requiring an environmental impact report and without prior consultation with the communities that would be impacted.<\/p>\n
For three decades, Mexico served as a veritable paradise for global mining conglomerates, serving up some of the laxest regulations in Latin America, all of it coinciding with the signing of NAFTA. As the Canadian independent journalist Yves Engler documents, Canadian mining companies were the biggest winners of the 1992 reforms.<\/p>\n
Seventy per cent of foreign-owned mining companies operating in Mexico are Canadian-based. Two years ago, the front page of national daily La Jornada\u00a0blared: \u201cPoseen mineras canadienses 60% del oro mexicano\u201d (Canadian mining companies own 60% of Mexican gold). Canadian firms have had many disputes with local communities over the impact of their operations on local water systems and ecosystems. Similarly, Canadian companies have been implicated in many rights violations including high-profile killings\u2026<\/p>\n
There were no Canadian mines operating in Mexico in 1994. By 2010 there were about 375 Canadian-run projects. Before the reforms that came with the North American Free Trade Agreement, Mexico\u2019s constitution dictated that land, subsoil and its riches were the property of the state and recognized the collective right of communities to land through the ejido system. Constitutional changes in 1992 allowed for sale of lands to third parties, including multinational corporations. Combined with a new Law on Foreign Investment, the Mining Law of 1992 allowed for 100 percent foreign control in the exploration and production of mines.<\/p>\n
That regime is now ending. Last year, the AMLO government began dismantling the preferential treatment for mining exploration and exploitation. As we reported at the time, the reforms, among other things, shortened the length of mining concessions, tightened the rules for water permits, expanded the grounds for cancelling licenses, banned the granting of mining concessions on protected parkland, and restricted licenses to a specific mineral instead of any type of mineral discovered within the boundaries of the licensed territory.<\/p>\n
Global Repercussions?<\/p>\n
Now, the government wants to go a step further, and introduce an almost total ban on open pit mining and fracking into the country\u2019s constitution. In the package of reforms sent to the legislature, the president included a modification to Article 27 to \u201cprohibit both the granting of concessions and the activities of exploration, exploitation, benefit, use or exploitation of minerals, metals or metalloids in the open air.\u201d<\/p>\n
If this package of reforms is approved, which is likely given the size of the government\u2019s majorities in both houses, it could end up having an impact on mining not just in Mexico but also globally, especially if other national governments in the region and beyond are inspired to take similar steps.<\/p>\n
Recent years have seen a growing resurgence of what is often termed as \u201cresource nationalism\u201d \u2014 which Wikipedia defines as \u201cthe tendency of people and governments to assert control over natural resources located within their territory\u201d \u2014 not just in Mexico but across Latin America. If the trend continues to grow, it could have major repercussions for global supply chains, particularly as the world transitions toward a supposedly greener economic model \u2014 a process that is guaranteed to be mining intensive.<\/p>\n
Mexico is the world\u2019s largest silver producer, accounting for just under a quarter of all the precious metal mined in 2021. Much of that silver is mined in open pits. The country is also among the top ten global producers of 15 other metals and minerals (bismuth, fluorite, celestite, wollastonite, cadmium, molybdenum, lead, zinc, diatomite, salt, barite, graphite, gypsum, gold, and copper).<\/p>\n
Mining companies and lobbying groups are warning of the dire economic fallout the proposed ban on open-pit mining could have on the domestic economy. In 2019 alone, the mining sector generated 2.3% of Mexico\u2019s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), in addition to being the fifth largest source of foreign currency, with a contribution of $18.4 billion. Open pit mining accounts for roughly 60% of the country\u2019s mining output. According to the Mexican Mining Chamber, Caminex, a wholesale prohibition could trigger a 1% contraction in the country\u2019s GDP, threatening some 200,000 jobs.<\/p>\n
\u201cOpen-pit mining should not be banned, but rather encouraged so as to consolidate Mexico\u2019s position as a producer of essential minerals,\u201d said Camimex. \u201cIt is a serious activity that is practised throughout the world, and operating it responsibly and safely is the duty of all stakeholders. Responsible industry should not be penalised, nor should the country\u2019s competitiveness be limited.\u201d<\/p>\n
A Rebalancing of Power <\/p>\n
The potential economic hit was also flagged by an exploration executive cited in an S&P Global report published in June. The executive warned that underground operations tend to be smaller than open pit jobs, generating less revenue and creating fewer jobs. The report, however, includes an interesting caveat from Katherine Matthews and Jason Holden, mining analysts with S&P Global Commodity Insights:<\/p>\n
While on the surface the Mining Reform may seem extreme, many of these new and amended regulations are standard practice in many jurisdictions, particularly those with a well-established mining legacy. Enhancements to environmental oversight and additional rights for Indigenous people are key to bringing Mexico up to the standard of many of the large mining destinations.<\/p>\n
In other words, AMLO is simply bringing Mexico\u2019s mining regulations up to most first-world standards. But his reforms also seek to rebalance power between the State and mining companies, most of them majority owned by foreign corporations, many of them based in Canada.<\/p>\n
Also, as the Mexican newspaper El Universal noted last week, Morena and its coalition partners have approved a key exception to the proposed rules meaning that open-pit mining and fracking can be authorised \u201cin rare cases determined by the federal Executive\u2026 due to their strategic importance for national development.\u201d<\/p>\n
This exception clause will almost certainly be activated for cement mines (in Cemex, Mexico boasts one of the largest cement manufacturers in the world) as well as the mining of lithium deposits and other special cases, but it will by the central government that will be ultimate decided. The government already partially nationalised the lithium deposits in 2023, allowing private firms to exploit the metal but only in partnerships with the state-owned miner LitioMx.<\/p>\n
In response, the Chinese global battery maker and lithium miner Ganfeng Lithium, which had bought up concessions on lithium deposits in the north-western state of Sonora, has filed an ISDS arbitration case against Mexico at the World Bank\u2019s dispute settlement centre. It is not the only case brought against Mexico as a result of the AMLO government\u2019s mining reforms.<\/p>\n
The British company Cadence Minerals, together with its subsidiary REM Mexico Limited, has issued a request for consultations and negotiations to the Government of Mexico under the United Kingdom-Mexico Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT), due to the revocation of the mining concessions for the Sonora Lithium Project by the General Directorate of Mines of Mexico. The Canadian company Almadex Minerals has also initiated an investor state dispute against Mexico and is claiming at least $200 million in damages.<\/p>\n
Mexico is already the most sued member of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), as well as the most sued country at the World Bank\u2019s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) in 2023, with a total of ten cases brought against it. In the first three-and-a-half years of USMCA\u2019s existence (July 1, 2020 \u2014 July 1, 2023) 19 ISDS cases were filed, 14 of them against Mexico, according to Kluwer Arbitration Blog. Of those 14, 10 were filed in 2023.<\/p>\n
As with NAFTA, US investors continue to be the main users of investor-state dispute settlements (ISDS) in the USMCA era, accounting for 74% of claims, followed by Canadian investors with 26%. Mexican investors are apparently yet to file an ISDS case under the USMCA.<\/p>\n
This is all occurring despite the fact that USMCA was supposed to reduce investors\u2019 ability to sue countries. Under the new trade agreement, U.S. investors already present in Canada were allowed to use investment arbitration for only three years \u2014 up until mid-2023. Mexico and the U.S. negotiated an annex that allows investment arbitration to continue, but only in well-defined circumstances. However, Canada\u2019s relations with Mexico are regulated under the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, which includes traditional investor\u2013state arbitration.<\/p>\n
Pressure will also no doubt be brought to bear by the US and Canadian embassies in Mexico City. After the passage of last year\u2019s mining reforms, the US and Canadian trade representatives, Mary Ng and Katherine . The next day, Canada\u2019s ambassador to Mexico and the representatives of multiple Canadian mining companies met with Mexico\u2019s Economy Minister, Raquel Buenrostro.Tai, released a joint statement suggesting that the \u201cchanges in Mexico\u2019s mining law\u201d violated the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement<\/p>\n
Yet despite all of this pressure, the Mexican government seems determined to push ahead with its ban on open pit mining. If AMLO doesn\u2019t get the reforms over the line in September, his successor, Claudia Sheinbaum, will presumably take up the baton. During her campaign, Sheinbaum, a committed environmentalist, pledged to pursue the ban.<\/p>\n
![\"Print](\"https:\/\/cdn.printfriendly.com\/buttons\/print-button-gray.png\")
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n