Yves here. Even though we have sometimes linked to reports on the long-standing conflict in Sudan and the resulting starvation, as this post suggests at the top, the media has given it short shrift despite the horrific and rising human cost. After all, it\u2019s Africa, which ex the Middle East = not geopolitically that important. But as a tiny website, we are dependent for most of our stories upon the reporting of others. Hopefully this piece somewhat compensates for the neglect of the dire conditions and war crimes in Sudan. One can only hope for an end to this conflict, the sooner the better. <\/p>\n
By Priti Gulati Cox and Stan Cox. Originally published at TomDispatch<\/p>\n
For months, we\u2019ve all been able to stay reasonably informed about the wars in Gaza and Ukraine. But there\u2019s another horrific war that\u2019s gotten so little coverage you could be excused for not knowing anything about it. What we have in mind is the seemingly never-ending, utterly devastating war in Sudan. Think of it as the missing war. And if we don\u2019t start paying a lot more attention to it soon \u2014 as in right now \u2014 it\u2019s going to be too late. <\/p>\n
After 15 months of fighting in that country between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), experts in food insecurity estimate that almost 26 million people (no, that is not a misprint!), or more than half of Sudan\u2019s population, could suffer from malnutrition by September. Eight and a half million of those human beings could face acute malnutrition. Worse yet, if the war continues on its present path, millions will die of hunger and disease in just the coming months (and few people in our world may even notice).<\/p>\n
By now, those warring armies have driven Sudan to the brink of all-out famine, partly by displacing more than a fifth of the population from their homes, livelihoods, and farms, while preventing the delivery of food to the places most in need. And you undoubtedly won\u2019t be surprised to learn that, with their foreign-policy eyes focused on Gaza and Ukraine, our country\u2019s government and others around the world have paid remarkably little attention to the growing crisis in Sudan, making at best only half-hearted (quarter-hearted?) gestures toward helping negotiate a cease-fire between the SAF and RSF, while contributing only a small fraction of the aid Sudan needs to head off a famine of historic magnitude.<\/p>\n
From Emergency to Catastrophe<\/p>\n
In late June, the U.N.-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) system, which monitors regions at risk of starvation, reported \u201ca stark and rapid deterioration of the food security situation\u201d in Sudan. It noted that the number of people suffering hunger severe enough to qualify, in IPC terms, as Phase 3 (\u201cCrisis\u201d) or Phase 4 (\u201cEmergency\u201d) has ballooned 45% since the end of last year. In December 2023, no Sudanese had yet made it to Phase 5 (\u201cCatastrophe\u201d), a condition characteristic of famines. Now, more than three-quarters of a million people are in that final phase of starving to death. Indeed, if the conflict continues to escalate, large parts of Sudan may spiral into full-blown famine, a state that exists, according to the IPC, when at least 20% of an area\u2019s population is suffering Phase-5 hunger.<\/p>\n
Until recently, the worst conflict and hunger were concentrated in western Sudan and around Khartoum, the country\u2019s capital. Now, however, they\u2019ve spread to the east and south as well. Worse yet, the war in Sudan has by now displaced an astounding 10 million people from their homes, more than four million of them children \u2014 a figure that looks like but isn\u2019t a misprint. Many have had to move multiple times and two million Sudanese have taken refuge in neighboring countries. Worse yet, with so many people forced off their land and away from their workplaces, the capacity of farmers to till the soil and other kinds of workers to hold down a paycheck and so buy food for their families has been severely disrupted.<\/p>\n
Not surprisingly, 15 months of brutal war have played havoc with crop production. Cereal grain harvests in 2023 were far smaller than in previous years and stocks of grain (which typically supply 80% of Sudanese caloric intake) have already been fully consumed, with months to go before the next harvest, a stretch of time known, even in good years, as the \u201clean season.\u201d And with war raging, anything but a bumper crop is expected this year. Indeed, just as planting season got underway, fierce fighting spilled over into wheat-growing Gezira, one of Sudan\u2019s 18 \u201cstates\u201d and renowned as the nation\u2019s breadbasket.<\/p>\n
Sudan desperately needs food aid and it\u2019s simply not getting enough. The U.N. High Commission for Refugees has received less than 20% of the funds necessary to help feed the Sudanese this year and has had to \u201cdrastically cut\u201d food rations. As Tjada D\u2019Oyen McKenna, head of the aid nonprofit Mercy Corps, told the New York Times, \u201cWorld leaders continue to go through the motions, expressing concern over Sudan\u2019s crisis. Yet they\u2019ve failed to rise to the occasion.\u201d<\/p>\n
Worse yet, in the swirling chaos, even the food aid that does make it to Sudan is largely failing to reach starving populations in anything approaching adequate quantities \u2014 and when available, it\u2019s usually unaffordable. Famished people are reportedly boiling leaves, as well as eating grass, peanut shells, and even dirt.<\/p>\n
Starvation: \u201cA Cheap and Very Effective Weapon\u201d<\/p>\n
For many families, the one thing keeping starvation at bay may be a local free soup kitchen. In a report published in May, Timmo Gaasbeek of the Netherlands Institute of International Relations noted, \u201cSudan has a long tradition of sharing food. After the war broke out and hunger spread, community-level initiatives for sharing food sprang up across the country. These \u2018soup kitchen\u2019 initiatives are often informal but can be very well organized.\u201d<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/tomdispatch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Screen-Shot-2022-09-15-at-5.56.42-PM.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/div>\nGaasbeek warned, however, that soup kitchens can fill only so many gaping holes in a system shattered by wartime destruction, displacement, and crop failure. His institute estimates that at current rates of food sharing, 2.5 million people could die of hunger and disease by the time crops are harvested in September. In other words, a shocking 10-20% of the Sudanese in the hardest-hit areas could die \u2014 mortality rates similar to ones suffered during horrendous famines in parts of Nigeria in 1969, Ethiopia in 1984, and Somalia in 1992.<\/p>\n
By Gaasbeek\u2019s calculations, more aggressive food sharing through soup kitchens and other means could cut the total death toll to a still-appalling one million. But that seems unlikely since even the existing efforts by local mutual-aid groups and international organizations to provide food have come under attack from both sides in the war. Six international experts writing for the U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights have accused SAF and RSF of \u201cusing food as a weapon and starving civilians.\u201d They also found that the \u201cdeliberate targeting of humanitarian workers and local volunteers has undermined aid operations, putting millions of people at further risk of starvation.\u201d<\/p>\n
We recently got in touch with Hadeel Mohamed, an educator with whom we\u2019d spoken last October after she fled Sudan for Egypt. In a July 16th email to us, she wrote that \u201cthe war in Sudan, like many wars, has proved to be more an attack on civilians than on any armed forces.\u201d Still in contact with neighbors who stayed behind in Khartoum, she reports that neither army is protecting civilians. In fact, the two at times appear to be tag-teaming to do them in. When, for instance, RSF forces carry out a raid, her contacts tell her, SAF troops are often \u201cremoved from the locations hours before the attacks occur.\u201d Worse yet, for those now trying to flee as she did last year, \u201cSome said that, in their attempts to escape Khartoum, they\u2019ve encountered RSF forces waiting to loot them. All their supplies were stolen once again!\u201d<\/p>\n
Alex de Waal of the World Peace Foundation told the BBC that the RSF paramilitary is \u201cessentially a looting machine. They rampage through the countryside and towns, stealing everything there is.\u201d They even bombed and looted the last hospital still functioning in Northern Darfur state. No less horribly, the government\u2019s SAF troops are guilty of trying to starve people in areas now occupied and controlled by the RSF and, according to De Waal, neither side is willing to \u201crelinquish what is a cheap and very effective weapon.\u201d<\/p>\n
Echoes from a Thousand Miles Away<\/p>\n
Is Sudan\u2019s nightmare starting to sound grimly familiar?<\/p>\n
* Families displaced multiple times, with war following hot on their heels.<\/p>\n
* Food aid falling desperately short of what\u2019s needed.<\/p>\n
* Humanitarian aid intercepted by soldiers and other armed men before it can reach intended recipients.<\/p>\n
* Soup kitchens attacked.<\/p>\n
* Aid workers targeted for death.<\/p>\n
* Hospitals bombarded, invaded, and shut down.<\/p>\n
* Crop production capacity sabotaged during a hunger emergency.<\/p>\n
* Washington doing little or nothing to stop the horror.<\/p>\n
Might we be thinking, perhaps, of a small 25-mile strip of territory a thousand miles directly north of Khartoum, just on the other side of Egypt?<\/p>\n
Sadly enough, there are many striking parallels between the wars being waged on the civilian populations of Sudan and Gaza. It would nonetheless be wrong to blame world interest in the nightmare in Gaza for drawing attention away from the civil war in Sudan. Neither of those crimes against humanity, in their scale and ghastliness, should be exploited by anyone to minimize the weight and urgency of the other. Worse yet, simply paying more attention to the nightmare in Sudan and sending its people more food aid won\u2019t address the imbalance. The fact is that neither the Sudanese nor the Gazans have received what they most urgently need right now: an end to their respective conflicts.<\/p>\n
Efforts by the U.S. and other countries to push for cease-fires in both places and an end to each of those wars have proven almost cataclysmically inadequate and ineffective. For Sudan, it\u2019s been especially discouraging. Talks last year between the SAF and RSF brokered by Saudi Arabia and the United States failed to even reduce the fighting there and recent attempts to revive those talks all too expectably broke down. In early June, Egypt hosted supporters of both of Sudan\u2019s warring parties in Cairo for negotiations. The only outcome: the creation of a supremely bureaucratic subcommittee to draft a meaningless communique.<\/p>\n
Collective Courage<\/p>\n
Last October, Hadeel Mohamed wrote that there was then only one modest hope in Sudan. For the millions of Sudanese living through their latest national nightmare, she told us, \u201cYou really come back to more community-based aid. With our limited resources, with our limited abilities, we still find people rising up to take care of each other.\u201d And they\u2019re still doing it. It\u2019s just not enough to prevent a disastrous famine, as long as the sectarian fighting continues.<\/p>\n
With weak support from the outside world, civilians in Sudan have little choice but to rely on long traditions of social cohesion and mutual aid as they work to survive and somehow bring the war in their country to an end. In that, there\u2019s yet another parallel with the war on Gaza\u2019s civilians: the coordinated service, heroism, and sacrifice personified by Palestinian journalists, taxi drivers, first responders, healthcare professionals, and countless other people is now legendary.<\/p>\n
Civilians in many such situations are too often portrayed in the world media as nearly helpless victims. The Sudanese and Palestinian people are showing that image to be fallacious by acting with the kind of collective courage, endurance, and solidarity that\u2019s all too rare in the comfortably situated societies that are leaving them to starve. They\u2019re being cruelly victimized, yet they\u2019re refusing to play the victim.<\/p>\n
The wartime food-sharing movement in Sudan that operates soup kitchens is a good example. It\u2019s led by grassroots neighborhood groups called \u201cresistance committees\u201d that started forming more than a decade ago in the wake of the Arab Spring, with the mission of providing social protection and provisioning in their home communities. They have since proliferated throughout Sudan, operating locally and independently but together forming a remarkably well-integrated national network.<\/p>\n
The resistance committees took a leading role in grassroots protests against the October 2021 military coup that cut short a national transition to democratic rule then underway in Sudan. Eighteen months later, the current war erupted when the two generals who had led that coup turned on each other, with one leading the armed forces and the other the Rapid Support Forces. Throughout the ensuing war, at great risk to their own safety, resistance committee members have played essential lifesaving roles. While working to fend off hunger in their communities, they have also prioritized the maintenance of human rights, continuation of social services, and defense of direct democracy, while urging fervent opposition to the SAF, the RSF, and more generally the incessant militarization of their country. Some are also mobilizing their communities for self-defense.<\/p>\n
Sudan expert Santiago Stocker suggested recently that the resistance committees, \u201cbecause of their support among youth and local legitimacy in Sudan, are a voice the international community should support and elevate.\u201d The committees are one part of a broader grassroots civilian movement that participated in those ill-fated Cairo talks. That movement, Stocker argues, could sooner or later help break the deadlock in Sudan by pressing other nations to move decisively to help end the war. They could urge, for example, that \u201cthe international community\u2026 increase punitive measures, including sanctions, against RSF and SAF leadership and key members of the SAF\u2019s governing coalition, including businesses and hardline religious groups.\u201d<\/p>\n
While it\u2019s important indeed that Gaza remains a focus of our attention as long as the nightmarish Israeli campaign there continues, it\u2019s no less important that those of us in the Global North focus on the less visible war in Sudan and push our governments to impose punitive measures on that country\u2019s generals and other elites, while pulling out all the stops (and ample cash) to get food to the millions who desperately need it.<\/p>\n
Sudan should simply no longer be callously ignored.<\/p>\n
![\"Print](\"https:\/\/cdn.printfriendly.com\/buttons\/print-button-gray.png\")
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n