The group soon shuffles to follow the same path nuclear waste would. First, to the unloading area, where a container called a TRUPACT, built to protect and seal off its contents if it\u2019s, say, dropped in water, dropped on a spike, or set on fire \u2014 is being readied for emplacement. Workers pull the actual waste \u2014 drums arrayed on a kind of lazy Susan \u2014 up and out of the TRUPACT shell. It twists like a carnival ride before being lowered onto a platform for processing. The radioactivity of this waste is low enough that the drums themselves are thick enough to shield workers.<\/p>\n
The site the waste is coming from (national laboratories like Los Alamos, or other Department of Energy facilities where nuclear weapons work takes place) and WIPP workers both do due diligence to characterize what\u2019s inside these drums, and ensure it is properly packaged. Sometimes that involves watching video of the drums being filled, sent by the facility; sometimes it involves X-rays that produce digital images of a drum\u2019s innards; sometimes, it\u2019s lower tech, like jostling a barrel to see if there\u2019s any liquid, as if it were a cup of dwindling soda.<\/p>\n
Technicians also measure the radiation from the waste, to ensure it is within the facility\u2019s medium-radioactivity limits. Perhaps most importantly, they take stock of \u201cfissile material,\u201d which decays by splitting into smaller atoms, to ensure that they can\u2019t start a chain reaction, in which fission begets more fission in a self-sustaining cycle that releases significant radiation.<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/undark.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Mining-West-Mains-1_2000.jpg\"\/)
<\/p>\n
To create the rooms where transuranic waste will be permanently disposed, miners at WIPP excavate salt at more than two thousand feet underground. Visual: Courtesy of WIPP<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
That\u2019s all difficult for what\u2019s called \u201clegacy waste\u201d \u2014 radioactive trash created long ago when records were less detailed and methods less stringent than they are now. Some of it was simply put in containers and buried in shallow trenches, or even above-ground, on the nuclear labs\u2019 property during the Cold War. Legacy material makes up much of WIPP\u2019s contents, and much of what will be in its future deliveries.<\/p>\n
For more modern material, also coming from Department of Energy sites that work on weapons, WIPP gets involved from the start \u2014 \u201cbefore we even generate the waste,\u201d explained Tammy Hobbes, vice president at Salado Isolation Mining Contractors, the company that operates WIPP on behalf of the Department of Energy\u2019s Environmental Management office. That involves preemptively characterizing it. \u201cWe understand everything about it,\u201d said Hobbes of this newer waste. \u201cThe process that was used to make it, how it was accumulated, how it was packaged, how it was sorted, how it was stored.\u201d<\/p>\n
No matter when or where the waste comes from, technicians, like those the tour group watches, always test for contamination, any potential leaks from its hazardous cargo into the TRUPACT, which should still contain it. If there\u2019s a positive result, the containers are put back in their TRUPACTs, and go back where they came from, carrying an embarrassing report card home.<\/p>\n
Those checks and balances have been fine-tuned since 2014, when WIPP experienced its greatest setback.<\/p>\n
February that year was a bad month for the plant. First, a truck hauling salt caught fire underground, spreading soot on important equipment and smoke throughout the site \u2014 and endangering the 86 workers underground. Everyone made it the 2,000 feet to the surface, but several had to be treated for smoke inhalation.<\/p>\n
Just over a week later, in a different part of WIPP, a drum of waste exploded, turning itself essentially into a dirty bomb, blasting out transuranic radioactive material in a fiery burst.<\/p>\n
Twenty-two workers received doses of radiation, and a small amount of contamination escaped into the outside world \u2014\u00a0about 3 percent of the amount of radiation from a chest X-ray.<\/p>\n
The dangerous drum had originally come from Los Alamos, where workers had mixed in the wrong kind of cat litter \u2014 a simple substance that typically helps stabilize nuclear waste. But in this case, instead of combining the hazardous substances with inorganic kitty litter, they had mixed it with \u201can organic kitty litter,\u201d the instructions having gotten garbled. And organic material can react with nitrates, causing chemical reactions that release heat. The increasing heat bumped up the pressure inside the drum, until it burst.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey were clearly being charged with getting as many shipments done as they possibly could, each year,\u201d said Bollinger. When quantity is the goal, quality can suffer.<\/p>\n
![\"\"\/](\"https:\/\/undark.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/UNDAR_WIPP_25th_29-AJ-White_1500-1200x1600.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Mark Bollinger, head of the Department of Energy\u2019s Environmental Management Carlsbad field office, speaks at WIPP\u2019s 25th anniversary celebration.<\/p>\n
Visual: Adam White for Undark<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
After the accident came a yearslong shutdown for WIPP, a period that DOE and WIPP officials usually refer to as \u201cthe recovery.\u201d When the facility opened back up, its speed slowed. Today, WIPP receives 17 shipments a week \u2014 whereas they were managing more than 30 when the accident happened. \u201cThey were hustling, and hustling and hustling,\u201d said Bollinger.<\/p>\n
Bowen, the Columbia University research scholar, considers the accidents significant in part because after the \u201crecovery,\u201d there was, actually, a recovery: The facility restarted, and there was not a total revolt from the region\u2019s residents.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat one was kind of surprising, shocking,\u201d he said. \u201cThe community and the state felt like it was a breach of trust.\u201d But, he continued, the relationship between the state, its people, and the feds operating WIPP \u201cwas strong enough to survive it.\u201d The site\u2019s shutdown also led to material improvements.<\/p>\n
In fact, the accident may actually prolong WIPP\u2019s life: For one, it lost almost three years of operations, so it will take longer to fill the allowed volume of waste. And two, the facility received funds to revamp. \u201cYou aren\u2019t going to put a lot of money and upgraded systems and then shut it down,\u201d said Don Hancock, director of the nuclear waste safety program at the nonprofit Southwest Research and Information Center, who advocates for limiting the timeline and contents of the facility.<\/p>\n
One of those investments, for example, is the nearly $500 million Safety Significant Confinement Ventilation System, an impressive series of tubes that can suck air from the underground and send it through the one of the world\u2019s largest set of HEPA filters, improving air purifying capacity both in everyday and emergency situations. It comes with a new air shaft.<\/p>\n
The system, which boasts pipes so big they tower around humans, would also increase the general airflow underground, allowing WIPP workers to mine salt and emplace waste simultaneously, whereas they currently only have enough air to do one or the other. The system is in the final stages of preparation, before it starts operation.<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/undark.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Science-reporter-WIPP-underground-8583_1500.jpg\"\/)
<\/p>\n
The ventilation ducts of the Safety Significant Confinement Ventilation System are so large, they tower around humans.Visual: Courtesy of WIPP<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
![](\"https:\/\/undark.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Science-reporter-WIPP-underground-8538_1000.jpg\"\/)
<\/p>\n
The ventilation system provides air to the underground. Prior to being released to the atmosphere, air is sent through one of the world\u2019s largest set of HEPA filters. Visual: Courtesy of WIPP<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
![](\"https:\/\/undark.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Science-reporter-WIPP-underground-8532_1000.jpg\"\/)
<\/p>\n
The exhaust stack of the ventilation system. Increased airflow allows WIPP workers to mine salt and emplace waste simultaneously. Visual: Courtesy of WIPP<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
The 2014 accidents may have been the most significant in WIPP\u2019s history, but yearly, smaller incidents also occur. \u201cIt\u2019s difficult to operate this kind of facility,\u201d said Hancock. \u201cNobody in the world has ever safely operated a deep geologic repository.\u201d<\/p>\n
And that is the difference between the real world and a report from a national academy about what kind of rock or mineral is safe: A place can be perfect in geological theory, but when operated by flawed humans, it will be subject to their mishaps and misjudgments.<\/p>\n
Perhaps that is part of why humans have had such a hard time agreeing about where to construct other deep geological repositories, and how to go about building them. Congress, for instance, mandated a facility for high-level waste in Nevada, called Yucca Mountain. After years of work and billions of dollars spent, the project was canceled in 2010. Before WIPP, officials considered an abandoned salt mine in Kansas for a pilot site, but they faced both state opposition and oil and gas wells they hadn\u2019t known about nearby.<\/p>\n
Abroad, other countries are making progress on deep underground repositories: In Finland, a permanent facility called Onkalo will soon come online, housing spent nuclear fuel. Sweden, meanwhile, expects to begin operating its Forsmark facility in the 2030s. Canada has narrowed its potential sites to two areas that proactively expressed interest in hosting. In all three cases, having the communities on board has been key to a smooth, if still lengthy, process.<\/p>\n
On the tour, the group heads into the underground area where some of these incidents took place. They shuffle to the mine office, where each person is given a brass coin with a unique number. It\u2019s like a dogtag, the administrator explained: If there were a fire, the coin wouldn\u2019t burn. But they would be able to identify the humans who had.<\/p>\n
That somber and vivid thought in mind, the group enters the open-cage elevator \u2014 which people here like to call \u201cthe conveyance\u201d \u2014 to descend foot by foot into increasing darkness, the walls of the shaft first lined with metal, then showing their true nature: just salt.<\/p>\n
At the bottom, the floor looks like a white-sand beach; the air is hazy with tiny crystals that stick to skin, leaving lips tasting like the ocean. A break area for employees consists of a salty room with salty chairs, salty picnic tables, and salty cargo containers outfitted with refrigerators and microwaves. Visitors can pluck (radioactively safe) salt from the ground and take it home in a WIPP-branded Ziploc.<\/p>\n
\u201cWelcome to the WIPP underground,\u201d a sign proclaims. \u201cYou have just entered an environment committed to safety.\u201d<\/p>\n
Above, giant bolts poke from the ceiling and extend deep into the salt, helping hold it up by transferring some of the load farther into the material. The salt is constantly shifting, creeping, wanting to fall.<\/p>\n
At the bottom, the floor looks like a white-sand beach; the air is hazy with tiny crystals that stick to skin, leaving lips tasting like the ocean.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
That\u2019s good for the future: When WIPP is full, and operations shut down, that crackle and pop will seal waste off from the surface, thousands of feet above. But it\u2019s worrisome when people are still working down here, among unnerving cracks and buckles in the walls. A 2014 National Academy of Engineering report noted that this creep makes salt \u201cpoorly suited for keeping the cavity open for monitoring and retrievability.\u201d<\/p>\n
The salt\u2019s geologic movements are the primary concern in the near-term, and so they are monitored, pointing engineers to where they should place the bolstering bolts where they\u2019re necessary for stability. Sometimes, though, not well enough: Since 2014, there have been several collapses. One happened near the area of the accident, which, since it was designated dangerous to workers, hasn\u2019t seen the intended maintenance, contaminated as it was. In whatever nuclear waste repositories populate the future, figuring out how to keep them stable \u2014 perhaps for much longer than is required of WIPP \u2014 will be important.<\/p>\n
That coiled threat above the tour group\u2019s heads, the officials creep in electric carts. They head toward an area where technicians are currently emplacing waste, where drums of nuclear waste are stacked three-high and honeycombed from front to back. The group, disembarking the cart, march toward this battalion of barrels, accompanied by a radiological control technician who keeps watch on their doses.<\/p>\n
If all goes as planned, the group is looking at where this waste will live forever, salt eventually crashing down on top of it. The infrastructure above will be dismantled, the entrances sealed, and signage placed atop warning would-be visitors for the next 10,000 years to stay away.<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/undark.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Science-reporter-WIPP-underground-8606_2000.jpg\"\/)
<\/p>\n
The tour group looks on at stacks of nuclear waste placed in one of WIPP\u2019s underground rooms. If all goes as planned, this waste will live here forever, salt eventually crashing down on top of it. Visual: Courtesy of WIPP<\/p>\n
Despite the accidents, WIPP is generally viewed as an experiment that\u2019s working. WIPP\u2019s groundwater, sediment, surface water, soil and vegetation, and air, among other things, are monitored for contamination that has not come \u2014 measurements verified by a regular Environmental Protection Agency review. And even its biggest accident \u2014 while terrifying \u2014 kept radioactive releases below the allowed levels.<\/p>\n
\u201cI look at it as a successful project,\u201d said Bowen, who toured the site a few weeks after the anniversary.<\/p>\n
Bowen\u2019s research deals in part with how to make future repositories successful, and he recently published a paper about a policy path forward \u2014 so that, ideally, those repositories will someday actually exist, or at least be on the drawing board.<\/p>\n
WIPP, his most recent study claims, \u201cpresents proof that the United States is capable of certifying, constructing, and operating a facility deep underground for disposal of long-lived nuclear waste \u2014 and, importantly, is able to maintain long-term community support for the program.\u201d That support is what makes it a success, he says. The state, with input from the public, has to concur with the Department of Energy on permitting the site every 10 years. It\u2019s one aspect of a technique both policymakers and researchers like Bowen now call \u201cconsent-based siting.\u201d<\/p>\n
The infrastructure above will be dismantled, the entrances sealed, and signage placed atop warning would-be visitors for the next 10,000 years to stay away.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Carlsbad, and its state-level overseers, consented. While they do not have full control over the site, the state and the Department of Energy have to agree on the parameters of the permit \u2014 and WIPP can\u2019t operate without the state\u2019s permit and so its permission. The task of reaching agreement is probably simpler than in other places, Bowen observed, because the area is acclimated to other extractive industries, which are risky and prone to contamination whether they involve nuclear waste or not.<\/p>\n
In Carlsbad, there doesn\u2019t seem to be much angst to speak of. WIPP provides 1,700 solid-paying jobs that are mostly in Carlsbad \u2014 a lot for a town of around 33,000. \u201cWe\u2019ve got 25-year-old rocket scientists coming in here, and nuclear scientists, and hydrologists, and civil engineers and mechanical engineers,\u201d said the CEO of the chamber of commerce, Chad Ingram.<\/p>\n
Most of the opposition comes, instead, from outside. At public meetings about WIPP, local dissenters are rare. Many live in Santa Fe, a place local WIPP supporters speak of almost as if they exist on a separate planet.<\/p>\n
The critiques these dissenters levy, though, aren\u2019t black-and-white, not taking the form of \u201cno nuclear waste disposal!\u201d Critics, like proponents, want the legacy waste cleaned up, and safely. But they don\u2019t trust WIPP with that last part. While the bigger cities in the region are unlikely to suffer ill effects from a disaster at the plant itself, trucks of nuclear waste pass through on their highways. And some residents are concerned about the safety of those trucks. Any vehicle traveling anywhere, carrying anything, can have an accident.<\/p>\n
They are also worried about WIPP\u2019s proximity to oil and gas activity. When the site was chosen, WIPP\u2019s surrounding area didn\u2019t have that kind of industry it has now. Today, the fossil fuel wells whir in every direction across the desert landscape. Given the new underground activity \u2014 and how it might expand in the future \u2014 people are concerned that the drilling may come too close to the WIPP site. \u201cThere will be inadvertent or advertent intrusion,\u201d said Hancock.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s a concern for any future waste sites: Who knows what will happen, anywhere, in 100, let alone 10,000, years? And it\u2019s of particular concern if future sites are also salt-based, since those places are where oil and gas reserves tend to reside too, according to the Nuclear Energy Agency.<\/p>\n
Those opposed to WIPP\u2019s operation also point to perceived creep from the Department of Energy. For instance, the law setting WIPP up declared that it could hold up to around 180,000 cubic meters of waste. Officials originally estimated it would take around 25 years to emplace that much. But in reality, it\u2019s taken more time \u2014 with the facility set to remain open longer than expected, and new kinds of waste that would require permit modifications.<\/p>\n
Given the new underground activity \u2014 and how it might expand in the future \u2014 people are concerned that the drilling may come too close to the WIPP site.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Earlier documents estimated WIPP would begin the closure process around this year, having filled itself to capacity. But since WIPP hasn\u2019t hit its volume cap, operations can continue, leaving some, like Hancock, upset at what he sees as an extension. \u201cThey think they can get away with it,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
If the Department of Energy didn\u2019t keep WIPP open, though, there would be nowhere to put the old transuranic waste that still needs a permanent home, or the new waste piling up: The U.S. is preparing to make plutonium pits, the cores of nuclear weapons, for the first time in decades. Castoffs from that work will end up here at WIPP.\u00a0And the stakes of figuring out where nuclear waste goes, according to Macfarlane, the former U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission chair, are high.<\/p>\n
\u201cOtherwise,\u201d she said, \u201cit will eventually get into the environment and impact human health.\u201d<\/p>\n
WIPP recently received its latest 10-year operating permit from the state of New Mexico. As part of the final agreement, the DOE agreed to look for a future waste-disposal site, in another state. \u201cI think it will be a consent-based siting program,\u201d said Bowen, of repositories to come. \u201cI don\u2019t think anybody wants to fight states.\u201d<\/p>\n
But it will be hard to find a new, permanent place \u2014 or other places for the other kinds of nuclear waste out there. \u201cAt some point in time, we\u2019re going to have to start this effort of establishing another deep geologic repository,\u201d said Bowen. WIPP, after all, took decades to open, so starting now could mean getting a new space in the 2040s or 2050s, with more waste piling up in the meantime. \u201cWe need to get going on that,\u201d he continued. He\u2019s hopeful things may get started in 2025.<\/p>\n
And as with WIPP, the hardest part won\u2019t be finding more salt spots, or deciding between volcanic rock and shale: It will be getting the people sitting in Washington and the people living atop those deposits to agree to something. \u201cThe affected public has to trust those who are implementing this process and those who are regulating this process,\u201d said Macfarlane.<\/p>\n
But the requirement goes the other way, she added: The implementers and regulators have to trust the public. That latter part often falls apart, she said.<\/p>\n
\u201cAt some point in time, we\u2019re going to have to start this effort of establishing another deep geologic repository.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Both sides of the process could probably use some bolstering bolts. But where and how to place them \u2014 literally and figuratively \u2014 remain open questions. And WIPP is the only place in the U.S. that provides some potential answers, buried beneath its desert surface.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s hard, at this underground hideaway, not to think of another subterranean spot nearby: the famous Carlsbad Caverns. It\u2019s a deep geological repository of another sort, storing the planet\u2019s secrets. A teenage cowboy and his friend found it in 1898, as they were rounding up their herd and noticed smoke coming from the ground. Thinking it was a fire, they went toward it. But instead of flames, they saw a flurry of bats emerge from a large hole in the ground. Later, the boy came back with wire, wood, and a lantern. Building himself a ladder, he descended underground.<\/p>\n
What he discovered, secreted away, were phallic and swordlike stalactites and stalagmites, speleothems gathered like monoliths, glass-clear springs. It was a whole world where time moved differently: slowly, unbothered by what the humans above did \u2014 at least until they descended and discovered it and built a gift shop on top.<\/p>\n
WIPP, built on human timescales and with human-made material inside, could be considered the caverns\u2019 opposite. And officials hope it remains so in its conclusion: unexplored, and unappealing to those who might come upon it in the future.<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/undark.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/sandia_1000.jpg\"\/)
<\/p>\n
In the 1990s, Sandia National Laboratories convened linguists, scientists, and anthropologists, among others, to figure out how to separate WIPP from the people of the future. They came up with a plan involving signs and symbols: The site will be surrounded by huge earthen berms, metal objects and magnets buried within, meant to reflect radar beams and make this place register as magnetically anomalous. The perimeter will also host 25-foot-tall granite columns, engraved with warnings, and no-go markers will be buried up to six feet deep throughout the site. WIPP\u2019s center, if someone gets that far, will host an information center that includes pictorial messages today\u2019s humans hope will convey \u201cleave this alone\u201d to future ones.<\/p>\n
\u201cOther nuclear waste disposal sites must be marked in a similar manner within the U.S. and preferably world-wide,\u201d read the multidisciplinary report. Its authors likely imagined there would be plans for such sites by now, and that WIPP would soon be getting its warnings. But it got, instead, a birthday party.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n